« FEF v. PCAOB: Oral Arguments on the Board's Motion to Dismiss | Main | FEF v. PCAOB: The Board's Motion to Dismiss and the FEF Reply »
Wednesday
May022007

PCAOB Litigation

The Federal District Court in the District of Columbia has ruled that the PCAOB is constitutional (no real surprise there).  We continue, however, with a backward look at the case.  Today, Vaughn Marshall examines the oral arguments on the motion to dismiss. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.