« The Director Compensation Project: COSTCO | Main | The Director Compensation Project: Marathon Oil »
Thursday
May142009

Director Compensation Project: Procter & Gamble

This post is part of an ongoing series that examines the way stock exchange independence rules influence director compensation. We are including companies from 2009’s Fortune 100 and using information found in their 2009 proxy statements. In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. While substantially the same, there are some minor differences between NYSE and NASDAQ rules that are worth noting.

 

Under NYSE Rule 303A.01, all listed companies must have a majority of independent directors sitting on their boards. Directors are not independent if they received over $120,000 in direct compensation, other than director’s fees, in any one year period over the last three years pursuant to Rule 303A.02(b)(ii). This is a looser restriction than the equivalent NASDAQ Rule, 5605(a)(2), which includes all compensation. Rule 303A.06 requires that, in addition to the general independence standards, audit committee members must comport with the requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 (C.F.R. §240.10A-3), also known as SOX 301.

 

One can see some of the effects of these rules when looking at the director compensation table from Procter & Gamble (PG-NYSE) 2009 proxy statement. According to the proxy statement, the company paid the directors the following amounts:

Name

Annual Retainer
($)

Committee Meeting Fees ($)

Committee Chair
($)

Stock Awards
($)

All Other Compensation ($)

Total
($)

Norman R. Augustine

12,500

4,000

1,667

-

50

18,217

Kenneth I. Chenault

25,000

4,000

-

-

-

29,000

Scott D. Cook

93,750

16,000

-

125,000

974

235,724

Joseph T. Gorman

27,083

6,000

3,333

-

-

36,416

Rajata K. Gupta

93,570

12,000

-

125,000

1,412

232,162

Charles R. Lee

93,570

34,000

10,833

125,000

1,100

264,683

Lynn M. Martin

93,570

12,000

-

125,000

1,030

231,780

W. James McNerney, Jr.

93,750

24,000

8,333

125,000

225

251,308

Johnathan A. Rogers

93,570

4,000

-

125,000

3,985

226,735

John F. Smith, Jr.

77,083

18,000

12,500

125,000

3,139

235,722

Ralph Snyderman

93,570

18,000

10,000

125,000

4,195

250,945

Margaret C. Whitman

93,570

16,000

1,666

125,000

511

236,927

Patricia A. Woertz

50,000

8,000

-

-

945

58,945

Ernesto Zedillo

93,570

12,000

-

125,000

3,757

234,507

Director Compensation. The Procter & Gamble board met nine times in 2008. Directors averaged an attendance greater than 83% of all board and committee meetings. Fees paid in cash ranged from $36,416 to a high of $138,583 for director Lee. The total compensation average for directors was $181,648; however, four directors earned less than $58,945. Discounting these four, the other ten directors earned $240,049 on average.

Director Tenure. Only three Procter directors have served five or less years on the board, while half of the board has served at least since 2001. Directors Lee and Martin share the honor of longest tenure on Proctor’s board, both starting with the company in 1994. Several directors serve on other boards. Ms. Martin serves on the boards of AT&T Inc., Ryder System, Inc., Dreyfus Funds, and Constellation Energy Group, Inc. Director Zedillo is the former President of Mexico, and also serves on the board of Alcoa Inc. and Electronic Data Systems Corporation.

CEO Compensation. Mr. Lafley serves as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Procter & Gamble. His total compensation for 2008 was $23,532,410; including a $1,700,000 salary, $4,000,000 bonus, stock awards amounting to $9,139,783, and “other compensation” of $343,791. Within the CEO’s compensation was $225,404 worth of personal use of the company aircraft. Mr. Lafley’s compensation was down slightly from 2007, where he received $27,735,734 for his services. The company’s second highest paid officer was COO Robert McDonald, who earned $10,951,777 in 2008.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.